• The login component features highly-secure protection measures to safeguard your personal information. Your login credentials are transmitted securely using SSL protocol encryption. This is true even though you do not see "https" in the URL, or a lock icon on the bottom of the browser window. If you require additional assistance, please email us at info@numetrics.com

    Numetrics application is temporarily unavailable due to system maintenance.
    Normal operations will be restored by 10:20 PM PST 02-Mar-10.



    Please wait while the application is loading.

    warning Your internet browser is not supported. Some Numetrics ERP features may not work properly. Details
     
    Enter your personal login to access Numetrics' customer area*
     
        Cancel
    * Login name and Passwords are case sensitive
    Forgot your password Security Concerns?
    Don't have a login name? Contact Us
    Browser Information
    • Home
    •  
    • Solutions
      • Overview
      • Schedule Predictability
      • Measuring Schedule Risk
      • Performance Benchmarking
      • Multi-Project Pipelining
      • Data Mining
      • Complexity Calculation Engine
      • Industry Solutions
        • Computing
        • Consumer
        • Industrial
        • Transportation
        • Wired Communications
        • Wireless Communications
    •  
    • Products
      • Overview
      • NMX IC Project Planner™
      • NMX Schedule Risk Analyzer™
      • NMX IC Industry Database™
      • NMX Data Miner™
      • NMX Software Project Planner™
      • NMX Multi-Project Pipeliner™
    •  
    • Services
      • Overview
      • IC Project Planner
      • IC Design Complexity Mgmt
      • IC Project Benchmarking
      • Quick Start
    •  
    • Consulting
      • Overview
    •  
    • About Us
      • About The Company
      • Management Team
      • Company Background
      • Why Numetrics
      • Career Opportunities
      • News
      • Contact Us
      • Insights Blog
    •  
    • Library
      • Case Studies
      • White Papers
      • Product Literature
      • Customer Videos

    Categories

    • ASICs
    • Best Practices
    • Best-in-Class
    • Case Studies
    • Chip Industry
    • Competition
    • Competitive Advantage
    • Customer Testimonials
    • Data Mining
    • design complexity
    • Development Cost
    • Diminishing Returns
    • Engineering Labor
    • Functionality
    • IC Development
    • Increasing Profit
    • Increasing Revenue
    • Industry Database
    • IP reuse
    • Meeting Schedule Targets
    • Metrics
    • Milestones
    • News
    • Off-shoring
    • Performance Metrics
    • product development
    • Productivity
    • Products
    • Programmable Devices
    • Project Planning
    • PRTM
    • R&D
    • Resource Leakage
    • Risk Analysis
    • ROI
    • Schedule Buffers
    • Schedule Predictability
    • schedule slip
    • Semiconductor Companies
    • Semiconductor Industry
    • SoCs
    • Spec Changes
    • Systems Industry
    • systems-on-chips
    • Team Sizes
    • Throughput
    • Time-to-Market
    • Utilization
    • Venture Capital

    Recent Articles

    • The Best Laid Plans of Mice and Men
    • The Elephant in the Corner
    • End of the Free Ride
    • The Realities of IP Reuse
    • Does EDA Matter Anymore?
    • Death of the SoC

    Archive

    • April 2012
    • January 2012
    • October 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • August 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009

    Tags

      Competitive Advantage design reuse EDA EDA Tools EE Times ERP software fact-based planning IC development productivity ip Kathryn Kranen new product development Numetrics Planning planning software product development Productivity project management software Risk Analysis risk assessment risk management Ron Collett Schedule Schedule Predictability semiconductor semiconductor design semiconductors SOC Staffing Projects system-on-chip Team Size

    Blogroll

    • A Conversation on Innovation (Sanjay Srivastava)
    • Daniel Nenni's Silicon Valley Blog
    • EE Times News
    • Harry the ASIC Guy (Harry Gries)
    • Industry Insights (Richard Goering)
    • JB's Circuit (John Blyler)
    • Leibson's Law (Steve Leibson)
    • Low-power Design.com (John Donovan)
    • Practical Chip Design (Ron Wilson)
    • The World is Analog (Mike Demler)

    Posts Tagged ‘ risk assessment ’

    How to Become a Top-Gun Engineering Manager

    by Numetrics | April 3, 2009 | In Best Practices, Case Studies, Customer Testimonials | No Comments

    The phrase “top gun” generally refers to hot-shot fighter pilots performing amazing feats high in the sky, but increasingly it’s being used to describe great engineering managers doing amazing things on land. Numetrics has put together an online seminar covering the best practices of leading IC project planners.

    The webinar describes eight techniques used by top-gun engineering managers, followed by a demonstration of Numetrics’ NMX-ERP™ solution and IC Industry Database containing more than 1400 completed IC designs from multiple industry segments.

    The webinar presented the following best practices:

    1. Computing IC complexity statistically
    2. Estimation of resource requirements based on models
    3. Rigorous “what-if” analysis for schedule / resource optimization
    4. Benchmarking project execution assumptions
    5. Determining the most aggressive, yet achievable project plan
    6. Quantitatively assessing the schedule / resource implications of each feature request
    7. Performing root-cause analysis at the project close milestone
    8. Foreseeing resource shortfalls across the project pipeline.

    The demonstration showed a live application of the Numetrics toolset, through a realistic scenario involving balancing IC specification and resource availability in the context of a fixed schedule.

    You may view the webinar at http://techonline.stream57.com/numetrics/.

    For more information, please e-mail info@numetrics.com

    Ensuring schedule predictability for IC designs

    by Numetrics | April 3, 2009 | In Best Practices, Project Planning, Risk Analysis, Schedule Predictability | No Comments


    Summary: Schedule predictability is the art and science of determining the completion date for your semiconductor IC project, based on a statistical model, validated across multiple designs.

    When you plan a project, you are working with incomplete information. Organizational changes, specification changes, technical challenges and more conspire to make it difficult to accurately predict when your new product will be ready.

    Schedule predictability is the art and science of determining the completion date for your project, based on a statistical model, validated across multiple designs. The key ingredients are your design’s complexity, coupled with your resource plan. With these two inputs, Numetrics can significantly improve the accuracy of your schedule predictions. One customer went from consistent overruns to accuracy within a few percent on the first designs they modeled in the Numetrics toolset.

    How is this possible? The core is the Numetrics ability:

    • To understand which factors drive complexity
    • To create a normalized characterization of your design that allows comparison with others.

    When we compare your proposed design with historical productivity and schedule information, we can statistically determine the expected schedule for your new project. The accuracy of the model is enhanced by our industry database of over 1200 designs, coupled with specific information from your company’s historical project record.

    The result is a robust, realistic prediction of the schedule, based on

    • Complexity
    • Resource availability and
    • Historical data.

    The value is a greatly enhanced ability to meet your market windows, time and time again.

    Effective what-if scenario analysis for IC development projects

    by Numetrics | March 17, 2009 | In Best Practices, Industry Database, Products, Project Planning, Risk Analysis, Schedule Predictability | No Comments

    Summary: Comparing the specifics of your semiconductor design with industry and company history enables insightful what-if scenario analysis to help manage development programs effectively .

    During the planning stages for a chip design, there are a number of variables that can be tweaked in the creation of the final product plan. We can reduce or expand the feature set for a new device. We can reduce or extend the schedule. And we can reduce or increase the number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) staff allocated to the project. By manipulating these variables, we can negotiate a plan between the different stakeholders. In some cases, resources are the limiting factor. In others, the schedule is non-negotiable (for example a lot of consumer products must be ready for CES).

    Running a lot of plans against all these variables has historically been difficult and time-consuming. In addition, the results have always been subject to arguments because there has been no trusted model to relate complexity, resources and schedule. Numetrics changes all that. By tweaking resource, schedule or feature set (complexity) assumptions, NMX-ERP can rapidly generate graphs that show the feasibility of each plan, and compare it with company and industry norms using their proprietary complexity engine and plan synthesizer.

    The speed and defensibility of these analyses lends them great power. It is not rational to assume productivity or schedules that are significantly different from past performance, so any feasible plan must lie close to the lessons of history. There is a cost to adding features, or to shrinking the schedule, or to reducing headcount. The most effective way to negotiate these choices is with the aid of an objective toolset that combines the specifics of your design and plan with industry and company history. The tool is fast enough that you can run tens or even hundreds of plans in minutes or hours. From these scenarios you can then pick the plan that best meets your business goals.

    What is industry-norm effort for semiconductor designs?

    by Numetrics | February 14, 2009 | In Products, Project Planning, Risk Analysis, Schedule Predictability | No Comments

    Summary: Realistic semiconductor IC project planning hinges on industry-norm effort, which is the comparison of the actual productivity achieved by teams across the industry and the actual complexity of their designs.

    Complexity is a measurement of how difficult it is to complete a design. It’s a measurement based on many attributes of the design, carefully correlated across multiple historical designs. But in order to plan, we need to know the amount of effort it will take to complete a design of a certain complexity. The answer lies in a comparison of the actual productivity achieved by teams across the industry and the actual complexity of their designs.

    From this comparison we can calculate the amount of complexity an average designer can implement in a unit of time. Because this is a normative value calculated across the industry, we call it industry norm effort.

    We can also make the same calculation for your company—assessing the amount of complexity your designers have historically been able to implement in a unit time. By comparing this with the industry norm, you will get a sense of how your team is doing as compared with the industry.

    But the main use of industry norm effort is in conjunction with the complexity data for a proposed design:

    • We can accurately and rapidly calculate the total effort required for that design using either your company data, or the industry norm data.

    This provides a firm foundation for realistic planning, while still allowing you to set aggressive (but not unrealistic) targets for your team.

    How do you quantify design complexity?

    by Numetrics | January 23, 2009 | In Products, Project Planning, Risk Analysis, Schedule Predictability | No Comments


    Summary: Design complexity can be quantified and communicated in a way that makes IC projects predictable and more productive.

    It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that the resources and time required to build a chip vary from one design to another. The variation is a function of how difficult the chip will be to build. We measure that and call it complexity.

    The hard part, however, is to know which attributes of the design correlate to the effort required to build the chip.

    • Is clock speed important?
    • What about the number of transistors?
    • Re-use?
    • Analog and mixed signal?
    • Voltage islands?
    • Modes?

    The list goes on and on. One of the reasons why the NMX-ERP™ software suite accurately forecasts the time and resource requirements for a design is that our engineers, using more than a thousand design projects, have developed a deep understanding of just how hard a given project may be so your engineers can be more productive.

    Knowing how to translate chip-design attributes into complexity is the foundation of apples-to-apples comparisons between designs. That’s critical to making sure your latest design can be compared with other industry designs, as well as designs your company has done in the past. After taking in all the complexity factors as chip specifications, Numetrics’ engines can reliably and rapidly calculate the relative complexity of your design, as compared with every other design in our industry database. That’s the foundation upon which all the plan synthesis, what-if scenario analysis, re-planning and root-cause analysis capabilities of NMX-ERP are built.

    Next Entries
     
  • Copyright © 2012 Numetrics Management Systems, Inc. All rights reserved