• The login component features highly-secure protection measures to safeguard your personal information. Your login credentials are transmitted securely using SSL protocol encryption. This is true even though you do not see "https" in the URL, or a lock icon on the bottom of the browser window. If you require additional assistance, please email us at info@numetrics.com

    Numetrics application is temporarily unavailable due to system maintenance.
    Normal operations will be restored by 10:20 PM PST 02-Mar-10.
     
    Enter your personal login to access Numetrics' customer area*
     
       
    * Login name and Passwords are case sensitive
    Forgot your password Security Concerns?
    Don't have a login name? Contact Us
    • Home
    •  
    • Solutions
    •  
    • Products
    •  
    • Services
    •  
    • Consulting
    •  
    • About Us
    •  
    • Library
    • Feedback

    Categories

    • Best Practices
    • Case Studies
    • Customer Testimonials
    • Industry Database
    • News
    • Productivity
    • Products
    • Project Planning
    • Risk Analysis
    • Schedule Predictability

    Recent Articles

    • How productive is your R&D organization?
    • The Brewing Innovation Storm
    • Doing Moore with Less
    • Sleepless in San Jose
    • DVCon and the Design Productivity Crisis
    • Lessons from The Checklist Manifesto

    Archive

    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009

    Tags

      cores design reuse EDA EE Times ERP software fact-based planning IC development productivity ip ip cores Jasper Design Automation Kathryn Kranen new product development Numetrics Planning planning software product development Productivity project management software Risk Analysis risk assessment risk management Ron Collett Schedule Schedule Predictability semiconductor semiconductor design semiconductors SOC software design system-on-chip

    Blogroll

    • A Conversation on Innovation (Sanjay Srivastava)
    • Daniel Nenni's Silicon Valley Blog
    • EE Times News
    • Harry the ASIC Guy (Harry Gries)
    • Industry Insights (Richard Goering)
    • JB's Circuit (John Blyler)
    • Leibson's Law (Steve Leibson)
    • Low-power Design.com (John Donovan)
    • Practical Chip Design (Ron Wilson)
    • The World is Analog (Mike Demler)

    The Design Reuse Paradox

    by Numetrics | November 23, 2009 | In Best Practices, Productivity | No Comments

    By Ron Collett

    The concept seems simple: The more ip blocks you re-use in an IC or system design, the faster and more productively you’ll get your design done. The ITRS roadmap began identifying the benefits as long ago as 1997, showing the industry could reasonably expect 56,000 gates per designer per year when using large ip blocks (75,000-1 million gates). By 2007 that figure was up to 600,000 gates per designer per year, a tenfold increase.

    There’s no doubt design reuse is here to stay. In 2007, a third of all logic was reused design blocks. That’s expected to rise to nearly 50 percent by 2015, according to the ITRS.

    The numbers and the theory behind it are encouraging, but reality is much different. Making 30 percent of your design from reused IP blocks doesn’t mean you’re going to be 30 percent more productive at the end of the project. That’s because IC design teams tend to underestimate the work needed to implement the reused IP. This can cause project delays and missed market opportunities.

    The challenge is that it’s very difficult to estimate design complexity, especially the impact of reuse. IC design schedules can falter because of the inability to estimate the impact of IP modifications on project effort.

    Design reuse chart

    Even a small percentage of reuse can add outsized effort to a development project. For example, if you add one new block of 600,000 gates to a 6 million-gate design, you’re adding 10 percent to the IC but increasing the effort required on the project by 24 percent. Adding 10 percent new circuitry to all blocks in that 6 million-gate design—with 90 percent of each block being re-used—doubles the effort required on the project, even though it increases the IC size by just 10 percent to 6.6 million gates.

    This issue will be part of a larger discussion Dec. 1 at IP-ESC 2009 in Grenoble. We were invited to sit on a panel—“IP Reuse vs. IP Leverage: What’s the difference, and what are the issues?”—with Kathryn Kranen, CEO of Jasper Design Automation, and Olivier Haller, who manages the design verification team in the Functional Verification Group at STMicroelectronics. Our director of professional services, Andrea Fortunato, will represent Numetrics.

    This is a well-timed panel in my opinion because re-use is an issue that transcends the industry and is crucial for its future. And how we go about optimizing design re-use is crucial to manage today.

    Related posts:

    1. Overcoming the challenges of design reuse: A Webinar By Ron Collett In December, we were honored to participate...
    2. Design Reuse: It’s Harder Than it Looks By Andrea Fortunato How best can we leverage IP...
    3. Why Most Semiconductor Design Projects Slip Schedule (Summary: More than 80 percent of semiconductor projects slip schedule,...
    4. Wrestling with Design Quality, Productivity By Jeff Eversmann Sometimes the simple questions are the most...
    5. The Changing Nature of Semiconductor Design By Ron Collett Big changes are occurring before our eyes...

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

    Tagged as: design reuse, ERP software, ip, ip cores, Kathryn Kranen, product development, Productivity, Risk Analysis, risk assessment, risk management, semiconductor design

    Leave a Reply

     
  • Copyright © 2010 Numetrics Management Systems, Inc. All rights reserved