<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reconsidering the Fabless Semiconductor Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.numetrics.com/2009/10/12/reconsidering-the-fabless-semiconductor-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.numetrics.com/2009/10/12/reconsidering-the-fabless-semiconductor-model/</link>
	<description>Numetrics makes semiconductor product-development teams more productive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 19:59:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Numetrics</title>
		<link>http://www.numetrics.com/2009/10/12/reconsidering-the-fabless-semiconductor-model/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Numetrics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.numetrics.com:8080/numetricsblog/?p=125#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Primarily, it&#039;s directed at semiconductor companies that are shedding their manufacturing to become more cost competitive. Without a fab as a differentiator, they&#039;re interested (or should be interested) in boosting design development productivity to compete even more effectively in the fabless world.
On the other hand, fabless companies are seeing new, more nimble competitors pop up on their radar screen--formerly fabbed companies. They too have an interest in boosting productivity to be more competitive in what&#039;s clearly shaping up as an interesting new era in the industry. 
Does that answer your question?
--Brian Fuller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Primarily, it&#8217;s directed at semiconductor companies that are shedding their manufacturing to become more cost competitive. Without a fab as a differentiator, they&#8217;re interested (or should be interested) in boosting design development productivity to compete even more effectively in the fabless world.<br />
On the other hand, fabless companies are seeing new, more nimble competitors pop up on their radar screen&#8211;formerly fabbed companies. They too have an interest in boosting productivity to be more competitive in what&#8217;s clearly shaping up as an interesting new era in the industry.<br />
Does that answer your question?<br />
&#8211;Brian Fuller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumontro</title>
		<link>http://www.numetrics.com/2009/10/12/reconsidering-the-fabless-semiconductor-model/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>sumontro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.numetrics.com:8080/numetricsblog/?p=125#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Is this for semiconductor companies with fabs or is it for fabless companies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this for semiconductor companies with fabs or is it for fabless companies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
