• The login component features highly-secure protection measures to safeguard your personal information. Your login credentials are transmitted securely using SSL protocol encryption. This is true even though you do not see "https" in the URL, or a lock icon on the bottom of the browser window. If you require additional assistance, please email us at info@numetrics.com

    Numetrics application is temporarily unavailable due to system maintenance.
    Normal operations will be restored by 10:20 PM PST 02-Mar-10.
     
    Enter your personal login to access Numetrics' customer area*
     
       
    * Login name and Passwords are case sensitive
    Forgot your password Security Concerns?
    Don't have a login name? Contact Us
    • Home
    •  
    • Solutions
      • Overview
      • Schedule Predictability
      • Measuring Schedule Risk
      • Performance Benchmarking
      • Multi-Project Pipelining
      • Data Mining
      • Complexity Calculation Engine
      • Industry Solutions
        • Computing
        • Consumer
        • Industrial
        • Transportation
        • Wired Communications
        • Wireless Communications
    •  
    • Products
      • Overview
      • NMX IC Project Planner™
      • NMX Schedule Risk Analyzer™
      • NMX IC Industry Database™
      • NMX Data Miner™
      • NMX Software Project Planner™
      • NMX Multi-Project Pipeliner™
    •  
    • Services
      • Overview
      • IC Project Planner
      • IC Design Complexity Mgmt
      • IC Project Benchmarking
      • Quick Start
    •  
    • Consulting
      • Overview
    •  
    • About Us
      • About The Company
      • Management Team
      • Company Background
      • Why Numetrics
      • Career Opportunities
      • News
      • Contact Us
      • Insights Blog
    •  
    • Library
      • Case Studies
      • White Papers
      • Product Literature
      • Customer Videos

    Categories

    • ASICs
    • Best Practices
    • Best-in-Class
    • Case Studies
    • Chip Industry
    • Competition
    • Competitive Advantage
    • Customer Testimonials
    • Data Mining
    • design complexity
    • Development Cost
    • Diminishing Returns
    • Engineering Labor
    • IC Development
    • Increasing Profit
    • Increasing Revenue
    • Industry Database
    • IP reuse
    • Meeting Schedule Targets
    • Metrics
    • Milestones
    • News
    • Off-shoring
    • Performance Metrics
    • product development
    • Productivity
    • Products
    • Programmable Devices
    • Project Planning
    • PRTM
    • R&D
    • Resource Leakage
    • Risk Analysis
    • ROI
    • Schedule Buffers
    • Schedule Predictability
    • schedule slip
    • Semiconductor Companies
    • Semiconductor Industry
    • SoCs
    • Spec Changes
    • Systems Industry
    • systems-on-chips
    • Team Sizes
    • Throughput
    • Time-to-Market
    • Utilization
    • Venture Capital

    Recent Articles

    • The Elephant in the Corner
    • End of the Free Ride
    • The Realities of IP Reuse
    • Does EDA Matter Anymore?
    • Death of the SoC
    • In Search of Best-In-Class R&D Organizations

    Archive

    • January 2012
    • October 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • August 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009

    Tags

      Competitive Advantage design reuse EDA EDA Tools EE Times ERP software fact-based planning IC development productivity ip Kathryn Kranen new product development Numetrics Planning planning software product development Productivity project management software Risk Analysis risk assessment risk management Ron Collett Schedule Schedule Predictability semiconductor semiconductor design semiconductors SOC Staffing Projects system-on-chip Team Size

    Blogroll

    • A Conversation on Innovation (Sanjay Srivastava)
    • Daniel Nenni's Silicon Valley Blog
    • EE Times News
    • Harry the ASIC Guy (Harry Gries)
    • Industry Insights (Richard Goering)
    • JB's Circuit (John Blyler)
    • Leibson's Law (Steve Leibson)
    • Low-power Design.com (John Donovan)
    • Practical Chip Design (Ron Wilson)
    • The World is Analog (Mike Demler)

    IC Teams Tend to Underestimate SOC Development Costs

    by Numetrics | September 25, 2009 | In Best Practices, Productivity, Project Planning, Schedule Predictability | No Comments

    By Ron Collett

    Underestimating the complexity of an SOC semiconductor design project is a growing problem in our industry. In an era where SOC projects cost tens of millions of dollars to complete, a week of schedule slip means $1 million or more in lost revenue potential. That’s unacceptable.

    That was my main point last week during a panel I participated on that was part of the EE Times SOC Virtual Conference.

    Former EE Times EDA Editor Richard Goering, now blogging for Cadence, captured the panel well in a post this week (Are SoC Development Costs Significantly Underestimated?).

    To justify the investment in an SoC, Collett said, the available revenue stream must be 10X the development costs. Thus, if an SoC has a $500 million market opportunity, development costs should not exceed $50 million. Today, however, development costs can easily reach $40 to $80 million. Collett noted that 60 percent of this cost is labor and that the major part of the overall development cost is verification.

    Richard, with a great comparison, went on to write:

    Anyone who has ever been involved in a home remodeling project knows how hard it is to get a reliable estimate up front of how long it will take and how much it will cost. Underestimating time and cost is commonplace. A large SoC design project is far more complex, with many more stakeholders. There is no simple answer to the question of how development costs can be accurately predicted. But there are some ideas about how to lower development costs.

    Tensilica CTO Grant Martin weighed in from the IP perspective, Xilinx VP of Product Development Steve Douglass offered the FPGA perspective, and ASIC designer Sven Andersson from Realtime Embedded AB talked about the value of verified IP blocks. It was a great conversation, and you can hear it in archived form by registering for the event.

    There’s some additional information about the panel (we tweeted some highlights during the panel) that have been cataloged under the hash tag #eetsoc.And we’ve published a helpful white paper on how to measure IC development productivity in our online library.

    Time really is money in the semiconductor industry, and quantifying schedule risk is an excellent way to maximize your engineering investments.


    Are SoC Development Costs Significantly Underestimated?

    Related posts:

    1. End of the Free Ride According to Pagemill Partners, a well-known Silicon Valley venture capital...
    2. Death of the SoC Rumors of the SoC’s impending death have been popping...

    Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

    Tagged as: EE Times, Realtime Embedded AB, Risk Analysis, risk assessment, semiconductor design, semiconductors, SOC, system-on-chip, Tensilica, Xilinx

    Leave a Reply

     
  • Copyright © 2012 Numetrics Management Systems, Inc. All rights reserved